Ronald Y. Chuang and Linda Chuang v. University of California Davis, Board of Trustees and Fitz-Roy Curry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the relocation of the plaintiffs laboratory space was an adverse employment action because it “constitutes a material change in the terms and conditions of ... employment.”
• holding that the district court erred in drawing an inference that a racial comment was humorous
• holding that the district court erred in requiring direct evidence of pretext to be specific and substantial
• holding that a decisionmaker’s remark that “ ‘two Chinks in the pharmacology department were ‘more than enough’ ” was “an egregious and bigoted insult ... that constitutes strong evidence of discriminatory animus on the basis of national origin”
• holding that a decisionmaker's remark that \`two Chinks in the pharmacology department were `more than enough'\ was \an egregious and bigoted insult . . . that constitutes strong evidence of discriminatory animus on the basis of national origin\
• holding that racial slurs in workplace are direct evidence of discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).