Skip to main content
· 4/24/1998

Russian River Watershed Protection Committee Brenda Adelman v. City of Santa Rosa

Citations

  • 142 F.3d 1136
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3088
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 4255
  • 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21265
  • 46 ERC (BNA) 1498
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7854
  • 1998 WL 196261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court properly deferred to the agency authorized to enforce 5 NPDES permits
  • noting that the presumption “may only be 16 overcome by pointing to some impropriety on the part of the 17 prevailing party”
  • noting that the presumption 24 “may only be overcome by pointing to some impropriety on the part 25 of the prevailing party”
  • noting that the presumption “may only be 9 overcome by pointing to some impropriety on the part of the 10 prevailing party”
  • declining to address Amicus’s argument where “it [was] raised for the first time on appeal, and not by any party”
  • declining to address UNITED STATES V. INOUYE 9 is a final judgment even though the district court is free to adjust the restitution payment schedule. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(o

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Farris, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.