Idaho Supreme Court· 3/21/2007

Ticor Title Co. v. Stanion

Citations

157 P.3d 613
144 Idaho 119
2007 Ida. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing that claim preclusion bars subsequent actions when the claim involves the same parties, same claim, and there is a final judgment
explaining that for issue preclusion to operate the “issue decided in the prior litigation” must be “identical to the issue presented in the present action”
issue preclusion applies only when “the issue decided in the prior litigation was identical to the issue presented in the present action”
“The doctrine of res judicata covers both claim preclusion (true res judicata) and issue preclusion (collateral estoppel).”
Claim preclusion “bars a subsequent action between the same parties upon the same claim or upon claims relating to the same cause of action . . . which might have been made.”
“Claim preclusion bars a subsequent action between the same parties upon the same claim or upon claims ‘relating to the same cause of action . . . which might have been made.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burdick, Eismann, Trout, Jones, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.