Magic Valley Radiology, PA v. Kolouch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since the second lawsuit involved the same underlying transaction as the first lawsuit and since plaintiff had been put on notice of a potential claim that could have been raised in that first lawsuit, plaintiff is barred from raising it in the second lawsuit
• recognizing preclusive effect of a prior bankruptcy proceeding on a subsequent state court action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).