Skip to main content
· 10/24/2002

Hindmarsh v. Mock

Citations

  • 57 P.3d 803
  • 138 Idaho 92
  • 2002 Ida. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim preclusion applies to small claims court adjudication and that “judicial economy is not served by encouraging resolution of property claims in small claims court and other claims in district court”
  • recognizing that without claim preclusion, \plaintiffs in small claims cases will not feel obligated to present all of their claims or all of their evidence ... and they can simply file again ... if need be\
  • recognizing that without claim preclusion, \plaintiffs in small claims cases will not feel obligated to present all of their claims or all of their evidence . . . and they can simply file again . . . if need be\
  • “The doctrine of claim preclusion bars ... subsequent relitigation of any claims relating to the same cause of action which were actually made or which might have been made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, Schroeder, Walters, Kidwell, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.