Skip to main content

Dockery v. State

Citations

  • 695 S.E.2d 599
  • 287 Ga. 275
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1839
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellate court accepts trial court’s fact findings regarding ineffective assistance unless clearly erroneous but reviews legal conclusions de novo
  • documents entitled “affidavits” were not such because they “were not executed with any of the legal formalities required of a valid affidavit”
  • documents entitled “affidavits” were not such because “they were not executed with any of the legal formalities required of a valid affidavit”
  • no continuing witness rule violation where lineup forms went out with jury containing only witness’s name and signature, number of photograph selected, date and time, and name of detective who conducted lineup
  • no abuse of discretion where trial court declined to strike juror who demonstrated his ability to speak and understand English by his responses in voir dire
  • given the volume of exhibits and testimony, and significance of the investigator’s role in the case, trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing investigator to remain in courtroom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.