Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/22/2004
Thornton v. State
Citations
- 145 S.W.3d 228
- 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1397
- 2004 WL 2099106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding sufficient attenuating factors existed dissipating taint of illegal arrest from derivative evidence obtained as a result of arrest
- holding sufficient attenuating factors existed dissipating taint of illegal arrest from derivative evidence obtained as a result of arrest
- discussing different concurring opinions in Crews and observing that majority of justices rejected claim that “a defendant’s face can be a suppressible fruit of an illegal arrest”
- discussing different concurring opinions in Crews and observing that majority of justices rejected claim that \a defendant's face can be a suppressible fruit of an illegal arrest\
- “No evidence obtained ... in violation of ... the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case.”
- 'No evidence obtained ... in violation of ... the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case.'
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Keasler, Holcomb, Price, Womack, Johnson, Cochran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unkart, Rodney GaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-06-05· cited 176×
- Ward v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-08-09· cited 65×
- Ashton Joel Carmen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-06-30· cited 38×
- Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-09· cited 18×
- Crayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-27· cited 8×
- In re H.V.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-17· cited 5×
- In Re HVCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-17
- in the Matter of H v.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-11-17
- Raul Adam Martinez, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-09
- Sierra Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2010-02-12
- Burks, Gene AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-03-13
- Burks, Gene AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-03-12
- Lewis, Robert Othella JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-15
- Blake Alan Cotton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-05-28
- Spotwood, Alvin Van IiiCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-12-18
- State v. Uyless Troy BlandTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2016-10-13
- William Dale Perkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2017-01-11
- Jerel Chinedu Igboji v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2020-09-22
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,424×
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,385×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,184×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 993×
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 832×
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 658×
- Sossamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-08· cited 81×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-15· cited 76×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.