Skip to main content

Ex Parte Smith

Citations

  • 977 S.W.2d 610
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 94
  • 1998 WL 391832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Presiding Judge McCormick's concurring opinion in Davis \was joined by a majority of the Court and may be regarded as an opinion for the Court\
  • noting that Presiding Judge McCormick’s concurring opinion in Davis “was joined by a majority of the Court and may be regarded as an opinion for the Court”
  • explaining why a concurring opinion in another case may be regarded as an opinion for this Court since it was the only opinion in that case joined by a majority of the Court
  • McCormick's separate opinion in Davis may be regarded as an opinion of the Court
  • “Article 11.071 now contains the exclusive procedures for the exercise of this Court’s original habeas corpus jurisdiction in death penalty cases.”
  • McCormick’s separate opinion in Davis may be regarded as an opinion of the Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Baird, McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Price, Holland, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.