Skip to main content

In re H.V.

Citations

  • 179 S.W.3d 746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the distinction between accidently unearned statements in Patane and a voluntary, post failure-to-honor-a-request-for-counsel dis-positive, and holding that the fruits of such statements are inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.