Skip to main content

Bedford v. State

Citations

  • 857 S.E.2d 708
  • 311 Ga. 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in context, a witness’s testimony that “the truth stays very similar” was not improper bolstering because it only addressed whether another witness’s statements were consistent with other evidence
  • holding that, in context, a witness’s testimony that “the truth stays very similar” 6 We note that this Court has often used the words “credibility” and “veracity” interchangeably in analyzing OCGA § 24-6-620. See, e.g., Harris, 304 Ga. at 657 (2) (c
  • “Because [the defendants] moved for a mistrial after, not contemporaneously with, the State’s improper closing argument, the motion was untimely and the issue was not preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.