Skip to main content

Thompson v. State

Citations

  • 797 S.W.2d 450
  • 303 Ark. 407
  • 1990 Ark. LEXIS 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming circuit court’s denial of suppression motion under Rule 2.2 because no seizure took place when the officer did not restrain the liberty of the driver or show authority by exhibiting a weapon or ordering the driver out of the vehicle
  • affirming circuit court’s denial of suppression motion under Rule 2.2 because no seizure took place when the officer did not restrain the liberty of the driver or show authority by exhibiting a weapon or ordering the driver out of the vehicle
  • affirming trial court’s denial of suppression motion under Rule 2.2 because no seizure took place where the officer — who approached defendant’s vehicle at 1:40 a.m. — did not restrain the liberty of the driver or show authority by exhibiting a weapon or ordering the driver out of the vehicle
  • seizure of citizen in stopped car occurred only after officer addressed citizen and noticed odor of alcohol
  • Check on a car parked on the street with lights on and motor running

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.