State v. Harlan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that policymakers do not have to retreat from “interchange and discussion about important issues”
• noting that agency review is “to develop a factual record [and] to apply its expertise to that record”
• considering the question of bias in the context of whether an individual agency member could participate in a quasi-legislative proceeding
• considering the question of bias in the context of whether an individual agency member could participate in a quasi-legislative proceeding
• requiring “a clear and convincing showing . . . to rebut the presumption of administrative regularity”
• requiring “a clear and convincing showing . . . to rebut the presumption of administrative regularity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).