Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 67 S.W.3d 567
  • 347 Ark. 767
  • 2002 Ark. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address unpreserved state constitutional argument in a knock-and-talk case
  • court primarily looked to federal court appellate decisions, noting that every federal appellate court which has considered the question has concluded that the ”knock and talk” or consensual search procedure is not perse violative of the Fourth Amendment
  • court primarily looked to federal court appellate decisions, noting that every federal appellate court which has considered the question has concluded that the \knock and talk\ or consensual search procedure is not per se violative of the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.