Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2/28/2002
Scott v. State
Citations
- 67 S.W.3d 567
- 347 Ark. 767
- 2002 Ark. LEXIS 131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to address unpreserved state constitutional argument in a knock-and-talk case
- court primarily looked to federal court appellate decisions, noting that every federal appellate court which has considered the question has concluded that the ”knock and talk” or consensual search procedure is not perse violative of the Fourth Amendment
- court primarily looked to federal court appellate decisions, noting that every federal appellate court which has considered the question has concluded that the \knock and talk\ or consensual search procedure is not per se violative of the Fourth Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-04-16· cited 84×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-03-25· cited 68×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-02-22· cited 67×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-05-16· cited 57×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-02-28· cited 49×
- Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-02-16· cited 35×
- Hayes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 28×
- Woolbright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-04-22· cited 25×
- Dowty v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-06-23· cited 25×
- Boldin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-04-24· cited 24×
- Gompf v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2005-09-07· cited 24×
- Keenom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-20· cited 23×
- Latta v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-11-07· cited 23×
- Welch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-12-08· cited 17×
- Graham v. CawthornSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-04-18· cited 16×
- Hester v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-05-19· cited 15×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-01-12· cited 14×
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2017-06-08· cited 11×
- Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2014-05-08· cited 10×
- Bogard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-11-03· cited 8×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-01-17· cited 241×
- State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court· 1998-08-27· cited 227×
- United States v. Peter John CormierNinth Circuit· 2000-07-24· cited 209×
- Jonathan Rogers v. M. L. Pendleton, Officer M. G. Vinyard, OfficerFourth Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 208×
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisSeventh Circuit· 1997-05-19· cited 206×
- United States v. JonesFifth Circuit· 2001-01-22· cited 155×
- United States v. Juan Benet JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 1999-03-12· cited 98×
- Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-12-06· cited 96×
- United States v. Tomas RodriguezSeventh Circuit· 1995-10-23· cited 95×
- United States v. Frederick Dale AndersonEighth Circuit· 1977-04-04· cited 89×
- Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-01-08· cited 85×
- Wofford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-10-02· cited 83×
- Baxter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1982-01-18· cited 78×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.