Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/20/1984
Thomas v. Thomas
Citations
- 690 P.2d 105
- 142 Ariz. 386
- 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a spouse is not to be forced by the judgment of the trial court into seeking any employment, but must seek “appropriate” employment
- noting that property acquired during marriage is presumed to be community property absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
- stating that we “may infer from any judgment the findings necessary to sustain it if such additional findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence”
- stating that maintenance awards \cannot be based upon mere hopes and speculative expectations\
- evaluating sufficiency of property by comparing monthly expenses against potential for income generation
- We infer findings only if they do not conflict with the court’s express findings and if the record supports the inferences.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant, Contreras, Brooks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marriage of Gutierrez v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-15· cited 311×
- Lehn v. Al-ThanayyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-07· cited 120×
- Marriage of Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-07-24· cited 102×
- In Re Marriage of FlowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-02-25· cited 68×
- Marriage of Leathers v. LeathersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-13· cited 63×
- Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-19· cited 55×
- Rainwater v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-01· cited 46×
- Standage v. StandageCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-06-11· cited 37×
- Rowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-06-05· cited 12×
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-15· cited 7×
- Pioneer Federal Savings Bank v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-12-24· cited 7×
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. ParmeterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-17· cited 6×
- Bianco v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-01-26· cited 6×
- Ruskin v. RuskinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-31· cited 5×
- Garlan v. GarlanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-18· cited 5×
- Freeport Minerals Corp. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-04-05· cited 1×
- Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAYCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-05-20
- Francine C. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-23
- In re CotterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-06-21
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-28· cited 247×
- Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court· 1977-10-06· cited 76×
- Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 64×
- Lindsay v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-19· cited 45×
- Marriage of Deatherage v. DeatherageCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-01-10· cited 43×
- Sommerfield v. SommerfieldArizona Supreme Court· 1979-03-15· cited 37×
- Rossi v. StewartArizona Supreme Court· 1961-12-27· cited 32×
- In Re the Marriage of HinkstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-12· cited 23×
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-28· cited 22×
- Wineinger v. WineingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-03-30· cited 18×
- Wippman v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-09-18· cited 18×
- Mori v. MoriArizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-05· cited 15×
- Nesbitt v. NesbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-05-21· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.