Nesbitt v. Nesbitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where court otherwise has jurisdiction, a judgment rendered against an infant without a guardian ad litem may be erroneous, but is at most voidable, not absolutely void
• construction of Rule 17(c) by federal courts is pertinent in interpreting Arizona Rule 17(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-07-20· cited 70×
• Lawrence v. Burke
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-09-01· cited 22×
• Byers-Watts v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-03-29· cited 18×
• State v. Superior Court of Pima County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-02-07· cited 17×
• Marriage of Roden v. Roden
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-11-28· cited 17×
• City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-07-29· cited 13×
• Triste v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-01-15· cited 7×
• Bayham v. Maryland National Insurance Company
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-06-08· cited 6×
• Reid v. Reid
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-07-03· cited 6×
• Lucero v. Pino
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-08· cited 3×
• Combs v. Chambers
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1969-06-30· cited 2×
• Edsall v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-28· cited 1×