Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that such an “award does not violate either 42 U.S.C. § 407 or the Kohler and Kelly line of cases” because the court did not attach the husband’s Social Security itself
• holding that issues not raised in the pretrial statement are waived
• recognizing this court must examine the parties’ financial resources and the reasonableness of their positions before awarding fees under § 25-324
• recognizing this court must examine the parties’ financial resources and the reasonableness of their positions before awarding fees under § 25-324
• noting that an issue is not properly raised when it is not raised in a pretrial statement or at trial
• finding that the court abused its discretion in determining the amount of spousal maintenance owed to the wife when earnings attributed to husband were not supported by the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).