Thomas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a seven-year-old girl’s testimony that the defendant touched her “privates” after taking her panties off was sufficient to establish that the defendant touched the girl’s vulva
• holding that a seven-year-old girl’s testimony that the defendant touched her “privates” after taking her panties off was sufficient to establish that the defendant touched the girl’s vulva
• testimony that accused touched complainant’s “private” and “where I pee” sufficient to sustain allegation that accused touched child’s vulva
• victim’s use of the term “privates” was sufficient to sustain a conviction, even in the absence of any further description of the term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-12-14· cited 208×
• Lee v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-15· cited 205×
• Gottlich v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-22· cited 78×
• Guia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-12-18· cited 59×
• Lujan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-04-07· cited 46×
• Tyra v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-03-24· cited 41×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-13· cited 23×
• Whatley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-29· cited 17×
• Mounce v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-07-10· cited 10×
• Tallant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-21· cited 2×
• Leon David Lee v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-18
• Jesse Robert Proctor v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2005-08-24
• Victor Mendoza v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-04-22
• Charles Franklin Woodruff v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-07-26
• Bradley Curtis Kougher v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2018-08-08