Skip to main content

Nelson v. State

Citations

  • 505 S.W.2d 551
  • 1974 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony “He rubbed my chest” was insufficient proof to sustain averment in indictment that appellant did “place his hand Schoeplein v. State Page 12 against the breasts” of victim
  • holding testimony that Nelson “rubbed my chest” was insufficient proof that appellant placed his hands against the breasts of the child complainant
  • reversing fondling conviction because the term “chest” is patently broader than “breast”
  • reversing fondling conviction because the term “chest” is patently broader than “breast”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.