Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 812 A.2d 1050
  • 372 Md. 342
  • 2002 Md. LEXIS 951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, without physical evidence connecting the defendant to the crime or the crime scene, the defendant’s statement is “too ambiguous and equivocal” to constitute consciousness of guilt evidence
  • affirming the trial court’s holding that a witness’s psychotherapy records “are privileged and therefore not discoverable” where the defendant sought to obtain those records during pre-trial discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.