United States v. Norman Anthony King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• answering in the negative whether “an act which can be viewed as an independent execution of a scheme must be charged in a separate count”
• even though individual fraudulent banking transactions in a bank scheme can be charged separately, they can be charged in one indictment which will not thereby be duplicitous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).