Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 914 So. 2d 27
  • 2005 WL 2440899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Blakely 2 did not apply retroactively where defendant filed a Rule 3.800(a) motion, claiming his sentence was illegal under Blakely
  • holding that Blakely did not apply to defendant's conviction that became final in 2002, pre- Blakely but post- Apprendi, even though resentencing took place subsequently on a scoresheet error
  • concluding on the basis of Hughes that Blakely does not apply retroactively
  • holding Blakely did not apply to the appellant's 2003 resentencing because his sentence became final post- Apprendi and pre- Blakely, Blakely is not retroactive, and certifying conflict with Isaac

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.