McBride v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, like Apprendi, \ Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review\
• holding that \Blakely does not entitle a defendant to have a jury determine whether he has the requisite predicate convictions for a habitual felony offender sentence\
• holding that a jury did not need to determine whether defendant had the requisite predicate convictions for habitual felony sentence
• holding that a jury did not need to determine whether defendant had the requisite predicate convictions for habitual felony sentence
• holding that “Blakely does not entitle a defendant to have a jury determine whether he has the requisite predicate convictions for a habitual felony offender sentence”
• recognizing that neither Apprendi nor Blakely is applicable to habitual offender sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Galindez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-15· cited 159×
• Burgal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 33×
• Calloway v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 29×
• Burrows v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-19· cited 22×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-02-21· cited 19×
• Tush-ee Lewis Hunter v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-11· cited 17×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-05· cited 15×
• Gurley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 13×
• Tillman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-23· cited 12×
• Dinkens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-13· cited 10×
• Modest v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-09· cited 9×
• Bozeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-07· cited 9×
• Kepner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 9×
• Langford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-05· cited 8×
• Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-05· cited 7×
• Sustakoski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-24· cited 7×
• Sheffield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-08· cited 6×
• Matthews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-29· cited 6×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-02· cited 5×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-15· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Tyler v. Cain
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 822×
• Eutsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-24· cited 180×
• United States v. Emanuel Marseille
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-07-21· cited 96×
• In re: Will C. Dean, Jr.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-07-09· cited 71×
• Gordon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 18×