Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 456 So. 2d 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding of heinousness proper where victim died as a result of a severe beating
  • The mere fact that a suspect was under the influence of alcohol when questioned does not render his or her statements inadmissible as involuntary
  • bludgeoned skull supports finding that murder was heinous, atrocious, and cruel
  • “To render a confession inadmissible, however, the delusion or confusion must be visited upon the suspect by his interrogators; if it originates from the suspect’s own apprehension, mental state, or lack of factual knowledge, it will not require suppression.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.