Supreme Court of Florida· 9/13/1984
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 456 So. 2d 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding of heinousness proper where victim died as a result of a severe beating
- The mere fact that a suspect was under the influence of alcohol when questioned does not render his or her statements inadmissible as involuntary
- bludgeoned skull supports finding that murder was heinous, atrocious, and cruel
- “To render a confession inadmissible, however, the delusion or confusion must be visited upon the suspect by his interrogators; if it originates from the suspect’s own apprehension, mental state, or lack of factual knowledge, it will not require suppression.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-12-06· cited 59×
- Bello v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-06· cited 42×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-05-08· cited 39×
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-04-19· cited 28×
- State v. ManningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-05· cited 27×
- Wyche v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 27×
- Lamb v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 25×
- Francis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-20· cited 19×
- State v. MalloryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-28· cited 18×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-25· cited 18×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-31· cited 16×
- Thomas Rigterink v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-21· cited 15×
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-25· cited 12×
- Christian v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-09-28· cited 11×
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-26· cited 11×
- & SC17-246 Eric Kurt Patrick v. State of Florida and Eric Kurt Patrick v. Julie L. Jones, etcSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-06-14· cited 11×
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-09· cited 10×
- State v. GiffordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-28· cited 9×
- Wyche v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-20· cited 9×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 1,191×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-26· cited 745×
- Tedder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-11-19· cited 480×
- Johnson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1981-10-05· cited 332×
- Lusk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-26· cited 162×
- Buford v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-01-11· cited 143×
- Buford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-23· cited 120×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-20· cited 98×
- Welty v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-02· cited 96×
- Frazier v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-11-21· cited 93×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-12-11· cited 89×
- McCaskill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-04-07· cited 88×
- Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-05-22· cited 68×
- DeConingh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-04-21· cited 68×
- Reddish v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1964-10-07· cited 67×
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-06-12· cited 65×
- Fitzgerald v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.