Commonwealth v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confession admissible even though officers mistakenly informed defendant that he could not be prosecuted because statute of limitations expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-05-14· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Foster, K., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-03-20

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Herring v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
• Commonwealth v. Eichinger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-20· cited 275×
• Commonwealth v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 237×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 199×
• Commonwealth v. Nester
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-25· cited 199×
• Commonwealth v. Torres
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-01-18· cited 158×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 156×
• Commonwealth v. Levanduski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-02· cited 98×
• Commonwealth v. Templin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-04-24· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Gaul
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-27· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Huntington
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-16· cited 50×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 37×