In Re: Jerasimos Papapanayotou, Esq., Jerasimos Papapanayotou, Esq. v. Jeffrey Sapir, Esq., as Chapter 7 Trustee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, on a motion for sanctions, “a full evidentiary hearing is not required; the opportunity to respond by brief or oral argument may suffice.”
• noting that this Court has often required “a clear showing of bad faith” in addition to frivolousness
• noting that “[t]he opportunity to respond is judged under a reasonableness standard” and that “the opportunity to respond by brief or oral argument may suffice”
• explaining that relevant to the inquiry under § 1927 “is the fact that [counsel’s] behavior is repetitive”
• explaining that relevant to the inquiry under § 1927 “is the fact that [counsel’s] behavior is repetitive”
• holding where there is no evidence that a surplus is a reasonable possibility, the debtor lacks standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).