Ninth Circuit· 2/11/1985
Thomas v. Peterson
Citations
- 753 F.2d 754
- 15 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20225
- 22 ERC (BNA) 1608
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28711
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that testimony is sufficient to raise substantial questions as to the existence of significant cumulative effects, if it shows that cumulative impacts may be leading to aquatic habitat degradation, undocumented in EAs
- “If anything, the strict substantive provisions of the ESA justify more stringent enforcement of its procedural requirements, because the procedural requirements are designed to ensure compliance with the substantive provisions.”
- Forest Service allowed project proponent to construct a forest road with no other purpose than to aid a logging program before determining whether it could issue logging permits under NEPA
- “It is not the responsibility of the plaintiffs to prove, nor the function of the courts to judge, the effect of a pro- posed action on an endangered species when proper proce- dures have not been followed.”
- discussing the adequacy of piecemeal EIS’s
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckNinth Circuit· 2002-09-16· cited 185×
- Metcalf v. DaleyNinth Circuit· 2000-06-09· cited 177×
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 2012-06-01· cited 152×
- Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. SalazarD.C. Circuit· 2010-07-23· cited 141×
- Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 2015-06-17· cited 120×
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceNinth Circuit· 2005-08-31· cited 115×
- Washington Toxics Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyNinth Circuit· 2005-06-28· cited 112×
- Great Basin Mine Watch v. HankinsNinth Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 104×
- Churchill County v. NortonNinth Circuit· 2001-12-19· cited 101×
- Resources Ltd. v. RobertsonNinth Circuit· 1993-11-03· cited 46×
- Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2003-09-09· cited 45×
- Ramsey v. KantorNinth Circuit· 1996-09-19· cited 43×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. HoustonNinth Circuit· 1998-06-24· cited 34×
- Newton County Wildlife Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceEighth Circuit· 1997-05-06· cited 29×
- Montana Wilderness Ass'n v. FryD. Montana· 2004-03-31· cited 27×
- Lands Council v. VaughtE.D. Washington· 2002-03-29· cited 19×
- Greenpeace Foundation v. MinetaD. Hawaii· 2000-11-15· cited 19×
- Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Bureau of Land ManagementNinth Circuit· 2004-10-28· cited 19×
- Committee of 100 on the Federal City v. FoxxDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-07· cited 17×
- Greenpeace v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceW.D. Washington· 2000-07-19· cited 15×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 3,144×
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court· 1978-06-15· cited 1,928×
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 1,881×
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 1,141×
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 331×
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationNinth Circuit· 1975-07-30· cited 320×
- California v. BlockNinth Circuit· 1982-10-22· cited 309×
- Trout Unlimited v. MortonNinth Circuit· 1974-12-23· cited 183×
- Lathan v. BrinegarNinth Circuit· 1974-09-27· cited 173×
- Thomas v. PetersonNinth Circuit· 1985-02-11· cited 157×
- Roosevelt Lathan and Pearline Lathan, His Wife v. John A. Volpe, as Secretary of the United States Department of TransportationNinth Circuit· 1972-02-08· cited 144×
- City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation v. United States of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1980-03-14· cited 97×
- Columbia Basin Land Protection Ass'n v. SchlesingerNinth Circuit· 1981-04-20· cited 85×
- Save Our Ecosystems v. ClarkNinth Circuit· 1984-01-27· cited 84×
- Village of False Pass, Cross-Appellees v. William C. Clark, Cross-Appellants, Amoco Production Company, IntervenorsNinth Circuit· 1984-05-24· cited 75×
- Palila, (Psittirostra Bailleui), an Endangered Species, Plaintiffs v. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural ResourcesNinth Circuit· 1981-02-09· cited 72×
- George and Mary Daly v. John A. Volpe, as Secretary of TransportationNinth Circuit· 1975-03-20· cited 54×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. ColemanNinth Circuit· 1975-05-28· cited 42×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1983-09-01· cited 35×
- Timber Investors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1978-11-15· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.