Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 9/16/2002

Native Ecosystems Council v. Dombeck

Citations

  • 304 F.3d 886
  • 2002 WL 31051552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a single NEPA review document was not necessary in part because \there [wa]s no Gallatin II-wide proposal to amend road density standards\
  • holding that a memorandum that \evidences a decision to consider ... seriously\ taking certain actions renders those actions \reasonably foreseeable\
  • holding that a single NEPA review document was not necessary in part because “there [wa]s no Gallatin Il-wide proposal to amend road density standards”
  • holding that amendment of Forest Plan to allow a higher road density in a particular area was not significant
  • holding that a Forest Plan amendment was not significant because it did “not alter multiple-use goals or objectives for long-term land and resource management”
  • holding that a memorandum that “evidences a decision to consider ... seriously” taking certain actions renders those actions “reasonably foreseeable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Paez, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.