Ninth Circuit· 9/16/2002
Native Ecosystems Council v. Dombeck
Citations
- 304 F.3d 886
- 2002 WL 31051552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a single NEPA review document was not necessary in part because \there [wa]s no Gallatin II-wide proposal to amend road density standards\
- holding that a memorandum that \evidences a decision to consider ... seriously\ taking certain actions renders those actions \reasonably foreseeable\
- holding that a single NEPA review document was not necessary in part because “there [wa]s no Gallatin Il-wide proposal to amend road density standards”
- holding that amendment of Forest Plan to allow a higher road density in a particular area was not significant
- holding that a Forest Plan amendment was not significant because it did “not alter multiple-use goals or objectives for long-term land and resource management”
- holding that a memorandum that “evidences a decision to consider ... seriously” taking certain actions renders those actions “reasonably foreseeable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Paez, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Friends of the Wild Swan v. Chip WeberNinth Circuit· 2014-09-24· cited 158×
- Center for Biological Diversity v. National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2008-08-18· cited 141×
- Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardNinth Circuit· 2011-12-29· cited 119×
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceNinth Circuit· 2005-08-31· cited 115×
- Great Basin Mine Watch v. HankinsNinth Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 104×
- Lands Council v. McNairNinth Circuit· 2010-12-28· cited 99×
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. NortonNinth Circuit· 2003-08-19· cited 78×
- California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Department of AgricultureNinth Circuit· 2009-08-25· cited 69×
- Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. RittenhouseNinth Circuit· 2002-09-17· cited 62×
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. State of WyomingNinth Circuit· 2011-11-22· cited 52×
- Great Old Broads for Wildernes v. Abigail KimbellNinth Circuit· 2013-03-04· cited 52×
- Buckingham v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of AgricultureNinth Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 49×
- Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2003-09-09· cited 45×
- Selkirk Conservation Alliance v. ForsgrenNinth Circuit· 2003-07-17· cited 43×
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. BlankNinth Circuit· 2012-09-10· cited 42×
- Forest Guardians v. United States Forest ServiceTenth Circuit· 2007-07-20· cited 39×
- Twp. of Bordentown v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'nThird Circuit· 2018-09-05· cited 33×
- Anderson v. EvansNinth Circuit· 2002-12-20· cited 31×
- Lands Council v. MartinNinth Circuit· 2008-06-25· cited 28×
- Pacific Rivers Council v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 2012-06-20· cited 26×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 2,029×
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 1,141×
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 331×
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodNinth Circuit· 1998-12-02· cited 291×
- Conner v. BurfordNinth Circuit· 1988-01-13· cited 244×
- Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterNinth Circuit· 1988-05-11· cited 223×
- Metcalf v. DaleyNinth Circuit· 2000-06-09· cited 177×
- Robert W. Hall v. Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of the InteriorNinth Circuit· 2001-09-12· cited 121×
- Churchill County v. NortonNinth Circuit· 2001-12-19· cited 101×
- Thomas v. PetersonNinth Circuit· 1985-02-11· cited 92×
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Ass'n v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-05-31· cited 85×
- City of Tenakee Springs v. CloughNinth Circuit· 1990-09-28· cited 81×
- Washington Trout v. McCain Foods, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1995-01-24· cited 68×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1999-05-19· cited 54×
- Idaho Sporting Congress v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 1998-05-13· cited 39×
- Kleissler v. United States Forest ServiceThird Circuit· 1999-06-30· cited 39×
- Defenders of Wildlife v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 2001-02-12· cited 39×
- Saulsbury Orchards & Almond Processing, Inc. v. YeutterNinth Circuit· 1990-10-29· cited 29×
- Neighbors Of Cuddy Mountain v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 1998-03-04· cited 21×
- Kern v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementNinth Circuit· 2002-03-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.