Ninth Circuit· 8/4/2000

Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission

Citations

220 F.3d 1134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that \neither the mere existence of a prospective statute nor a generalized threat of prosecution satisfies the `case or controversy' requirement.\
stating that “neither the mere existence of a prospective statute nor a generalized threat of prosecution satisfies the ‘case or controversy’ requirement.”
not ing that “in many cases, ripeness coincides squarely with standing’s injury in fact prong”
describing constitutional and prudential ripeness in this context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Fernandez, Fletcher, Graber, Hug, Kleinfeld, McKeown, Pregerson, Rymer, Scannlain, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.