Canatella v. State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rooker-Feldman “would likely not bar” a 21 plaintiff’s claims where complaint “d[id] not request review” of plaintiff’s own suspension or 22 probation and instead sought “only prospective relief”
• “[I]n recognition that ‘the First 12 Amendment needs breathing space,’ the Supreme Court has relaxed the prudential requirements of 13 standing in the First Amendment context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).