N.D. Alabama· 4/21/2009

Thomas v. Allen

Citations

614 F. Supp. 2d 1257
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50825
2009 WL 1353722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[a] court must consider the Flynn Effect and the standard error of measurement in determining whether a petitioner’s IQ score falls within a range containing scores that are less than” seventy
“The constraints of a maximum-security prison environment also limit the diagnostician’s ability to assess the subject’s adaptive skills consistently within the AAMR definition.”
“A court must also consider the Flynn effect and the standard error of measurement in ^determining whether a petitioner’s IQ score falls within a range containing scores that are less than 70.”
\A court must also consider the Flynn effect and the standard error of measurement in determining whether a petitioner's IQ score falls within a range containing scores that are less than 70.\
“A court must [ ] consider ... the standard error of measurement in determining whether a petitioner’s IQ score falls within a range containing scores that are less than 70.”
“It [] is undisputed that Professor Flynn’s recommendation ... is a generally accepted adjustment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.