Thomas v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and noting that no expert consensus exists on how to apply the Flynn Effect to individual cases
• “There is no Alabama case law stating that a single IQ raw score, or even multiple IQ raw scores, above 70 automatically defeats an Atkins claim when the totality of the evidence (scores) indicates that a capital offender suf- fers subaverage intellectual functioning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).