Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 7/19/2022

Thomas Montgomery v. IRS

Citations

  • 40 F.4th 702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining APA claim was precluded because plaintiff sought release of documents, which is available under FOIA
  • applying three-part test to Golmar response declining to confirm or deny existence of records relating to alleged confidential informant
  • “Simply because the [plaintiffs] do not prevail on their claims does not make them subject to the exclusive review the APA provides.”
  • “We have explained on numerous occasions that the decision whether to perform in camera inspection 6 is left to the broad discretion of the trial court judge.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “[T]here must be some ‘good reason’ to reconsider an issue already litigated by the parties and decided by the court, such as new information, a misunderstanding, or a clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.