· 12/8/1995
The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs Service
Citations
- 71 F.3d 885
- 315 U.S. App. D.C. 177
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34437
- 1995 WL 722700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging the “obvious privacy interest” cognizable under Exemption 7(C) and extending this interest “to third parties who may be mentioned in investigatory files”
- collecting authority and holding that individuals have a privacy interest when they are “mentioned in investigatory files” or identified as someone who “provided information during the course of an investigation”
- directing district court to order further affidavits to review the adequacy of the search
- finding a public interest in records pertaining to federal authorities’ drug interdiction efforts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Silberman, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.