Skip to main content
· 12/8/1995

The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs Service

Citations

  • 71 F.3d 885
  • 315 U.S. App. D.C. 177
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34437
  • 1995 WL 722700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging the “obvious privacy interest” cognizable under Exemption 7(C) and extending this interest “to third parties who may be mentioned in investigatory files”
  • collecting authority and holding that individuals have a privacy interest when they are “mentioned in investigatory files” or identified as someone who “provided information during the course of an investigation”
  • directing district court to order further affidavits to review the adequacy of the search
  • finding a public interest in records pertaining to federal authorities’ drug interdiction efforts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Silberman, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.