D.C. Circuit· 6/7/2024
National Security Archive v. CIA
Citations
- 104 F.4th 267
Oral argument
- ListenArgued19 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- clarifying that the public domain doctrine is not “separate and distinct from the official acknowledgement doctrine”
- discussing the objective of the FOIA as providing access to government records
- “[T]he mere public disclosure of information . . . cannot overcome an otherwise valid FOIA exemption.”
- “This court is charged with following case law that directly controls a particular issue, ‘leaving to [the Supreme] Court the prerogative of overruling its own decisions.’” (alteration in original
- “This Court is charged with following case law that directly controls a particular issue[.]”
- “This Court is charged with following case law that directly controls a particular issue[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilcox v. TrumpDistrict of Columbia· 2025-03-06
- Cathy Harris v. Scott BessentD.C. Circuit· 2025-03-28
- Gwynne Wilcox v. Donald TrumpD.C. Circuit· 2025-04-07
- The Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Secretary Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 2025-04-29
- Slaughter v. TrumpDistrict of Columbia· 2025-07-17
- Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, Inc. v. DOJD.C. Circuit· 2025-07-18
- Rebecca Slaughter v. Donald TrumpD.C. Circuit· 2025-09-02
- Campaign for Accountability v. DOJD.C. Circuit· 2025-10-17
- Neguse v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict of Columbia· 2025-12-17
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2026-02-19
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2026-03-30
- Barry v. United Food and Commercial WorkersDistrict of Columbia· 2026-05-21
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court· 2021-06-25· cited 3,213×
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,918×
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 992×
- United States Department of State v. RaySupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 755×
- Wolf v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2007-01-16· cited 615×
- Students Against Genocide v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 2001-08-07· cited 535×
- Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence Agency Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1990-08-14· cited 423×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 2011-09-06· cited 410×
- Nassar Afshar v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 1983-03-15· cited 325×
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2015-11-13· cited 226×
- Cottone, Salvatore v. Reno, JanetD.C. Circuit· 1999-10-26· cited 185×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2013-03-15· cited 178×
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election IntegrityD.C. Circuit· 2017-12-26· cited 112×
- Frugone v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1999-03-12· cited 102×
- Anna Jaques Hospital v. SebeliusD.C. Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 40×
- Thomas Montgomery v. IRSD.C. Circuit· 2022-07-19· cited 37×
- Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. CIAD.C. Circuit· 2021-08-27· cited 34×
- Pavement Coatings Technology v. United States Geological SurveyD.C. Circuit· 2021-05-07· cited 12×
- Insider Inc. v. GSAD.C. Circuit· 2024-02-16· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.