Gates v. Gates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is improper for this Court reweigh the evidence when reviewing the financial aspects in a divorce proceeding
• “[I]t is apparent appellant is urging us to simply reweigh the section 3502 factors in the hope the scales will tip in his favor the second time around. We cannot do so in the absence of an abuse of discretion, which appellant has failed to demonstrate.”
• abuse of discretion standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gates v. Gates
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-10· cited 36×
• Pierce v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-08-24· cited 6×
• Martin, R. v. Martin, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-07-22· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Isralsky v. Isralsky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-28· cited 100×
• Teodorski v. Teodorski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-12· cited 98×
• Busse v. Busse
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-11· cited 85×
• Moran v. Moran
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-25· cited 71×
• Xinda Wang v. Zhiping Feng
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-13· cited 56×
• Humphreys v. DeRoss
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-20· cited 45×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-17· cited 30×
• Fexa v. Fexa
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-02· cited 23×
• Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-19· cited 16×
• Plitka v. Plitka
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-22· cited 13×