Skip to main content

Teniente v. State

Citations

  • 2007 WY 165
  • 169 P.3d 512
  • 2007 Wyo. LEXIS 177
  • 2007 WL 3026012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking to context in which statements were made because “this Court can never know what was going through the prosecutor’s mind”
  • looking to context in which statements were made because “this Court can never know what was going through the prosecutor’s mind”
  • no impermissible comment where “prosecutor was pointing out what Teniente had said, not his failure to speak”
  • no impermissible comment where “prosecutor was pointing out what Teniente had said, not his failure to speak”
  • \[Thhe defendant bears the burden of proving prejudice\ relating to claims of prosecu-torial misconduct.
  • \[The defendant bears the burden of proving prejudice\ relating to claims of prosecu-torial misconduct.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voigt, Golden, Hill, Kite, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.