Michael Allan Lindstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no prosecutorial misconduct because unnoticed testimony did not implicate any act of the defendant
• “With the amendment, Mr. Lindstrom still attempted to prove he was not in Buffalo when the offenses occurred and could not, therefore, have committed them. Under these circumstances, the amendment did not prejudice his defense.”
• no prejudice given the magnitude of evidence against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).