United States v. George Gallego, Steven Martinez and Alfredo Gallego

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even were we to conclude that the district court erred by admitting [the] plea allocution into evidence, the record before us makes it clear that any such error would have been harmless.”
• abrogated on other grounds by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). 4 It is not clear whether Rowe raises the same double jeopardy arguments in relation to his conviction in the third trial under 18 U.S.C. § 924(j

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).