Temple v. Synthes Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that joint tortfeasors were simply permissive parties to an action against one of them
• holding that Rule 19(b) inquiry necessary only if party satisfies threshold requirement of Rule 19(a)
• holding that a party’s status as a joint tortfeasor does not make them a necessary or indispensable party but simply a permissive party to an action against one of them
• holding that a party’s status as a joint tortfeasor does not make them a necessary or indispensable party but simply a permissive party to an action against one of them
• holding that a party’s status as a joint tortfeasor does not make them a necessary or indispensable party but simply a permissive party to an action against one of them
• establishing that Rule 19(b) inquiry is required only if party satisfies the threshold requirements of Rule 19(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

178 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. Lama
  Eleventh Circuit· 2011-02-24· cited 298×
• In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2017-08-15· cited 260×
• Goldman, Antonetti, Ferraiuoli, Axtmayer & Hertell, a Partnership v. Medfit International, Inc., Hector Rodriguez
  First Circuit· 1993-01-06· cited 156×
• In Re EMC Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2012-05-04· cited 143×
• Painewebber, Inc. v. Alfred M. Cohen, of the Estate of Samuel Ginsburg
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-12-27· cited 126×
• In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (\MTBE\) Products Liability Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2002-07-16· cited 124×
• Bailey v. Bayer Cropscience L.P.
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-04-09· cited 101×
• Huber v. Taylor
  Third Circuit· 2008-07-11· cited 98×
• Lomando v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2011-12-30· cited 96×
• Concat Lp v. Unilever, Plc
  N.D. California· 2004-09-07· cited 79×
• Bodner v. Banque Paribas
  E.D. New York· 2000-08-31· cited 61×
• MS Dealer Service Corp. v. Franklin
  Eleventh Circuit· 1999-05-28· cited 60×
• Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2003-03-19· cited 60×
• Melissa Wilson v. Darin Gordon
  Sixth Circuit· 2016-05-23· cited 57×
• Shibata v. Lim
  M.D. Florida· 2000-12-11· cited 50×
• Laker Airways, Inc. v. British Airways, PLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 49×
• Humphries v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-11-07· cited 49×
• Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC v. Rutherford
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-05-14· cited 47×
• Pettiford v. City of Greensboro
  M.D. North Carolina· 2008-05-30· cited 42×
• In Re Toyota Motor Corp.
  C.D. California· 2011-04-08· cited 39×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson
  Supreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,299×
• Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 1,049×
• Jack Nottingham v. General American Communications Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-03-06· cited 57×

Other cases named Temple v. Synthes Corp.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Temple v. Synthes Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 1990-04-11
• Temple v. Synthes Corp.
  E.D. Louisiana· 1989-07-24
• Temple v. Synthes Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-07
• Temple v. Synthes Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-07