Concat Lp v. Unilever, Plc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when evaluating the arbitrability of dispute, court 11 must rely on contract containing arbitration agreement
• disqualifying the law firm, explaining that even if an ethical wall could have prevented a conflict, it was not implemented until three months after the dispute was initiated, and was thus, too late to be effective
• finding an ethical wall could do nothing to mitigate or cure a conflict arising from the concurrent representation of adverse clients because the purpose of the prohibition against such relationship is to preserve the attorney’s paramount duty of loyalty, not confidentiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).