Third Circuit· 7/11/2008

Huber v. Taylor

Citations

532 F.3d 237
71 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 45
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14719
2008 WL 2697774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a party’s interest is determined by reference to state law in diversity cases
claims for punitive damages may go toward satisfying the amount-in-controversy requirement as long as they are not patently frivolous
“That issue preclusion is possible, however, is not enough to trigger a Rule 19(a)(2)(i) finding.”
“While subsequent events have established that [p]laintiffs cannot prevail on their claims of fraud, we have found that those subsequent events did not destroy the court’s diversity jurisdiction.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Nygaard, Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.