Jack Nottingham v. General American Communications Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is well-established” that Rule 19 does not require the joinder of joint tortfeasors, principal and agent, or persons against whom a party has a claim for contribution
• “Moreover, it is well-established that Rule 19 does not require the joinder of joint tortfeasors.”
• “[t]he Fifth Circuit has held that Rule 19 does not require the joinder of persons against whom a defendant may have a claim for contribution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Temple v. Synthes Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-07· cited 368×
• Lomando v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2011-12-30· cited 96×
• People v. Fuller
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-03-05· cited 48×
• Harsh v. Petroll
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-10· cited 41×
• Insurance Co. of North America v. Morris
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-09-12· cited 25×
• Frizzell v. Cook
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1990-04-18· cited 24×
• Lachalet International, Inc. v. Nowik
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-02-26· cited 23×
• Tross v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co.
  D. Connecticut· 2013-03-06· cited 21×
• Kuhn Construction Co. v. Ocean & Coastal Consultants, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2010-07-15· cited 15×
• Bates v. Laminack
  S.D. Texas· 2013-04-01· cited 14×
• United States v. Dawn Properties, Inc.
  S.D. Mississippi· 2014-11-26· cited 9×
• F & M Distributors, Inc. v. American Hardware Supply Co.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-02-15· cited 9×
• Intercept Security Corp. v. Code-Alarm, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1995-10-23· cited 9×
• Fulk v. McLellan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-04-02· cited 8×
• Moreno v. EDCare Management, Inc.
  W.D. Texas· 2007-06-13· cited 8×
• Depriest v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.
  M.D. Louisiana· 1988-04-25· cited 7×
• James v. Valvoline, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2001-08-08· cited 6×
• Kerr v. Smith Petroleum Co.
  E.D. Louisiana· 1995-06-14· cited 5×
• Payan v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2005-08-10· cited 5×
• Hall v. National Service Industries, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-04-28· cited 5×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Randall v. Loftsgaarden
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 320×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. Love
  Fifth Circuit· 1970-07-14· cited 229×
• Woo v. Great Southwestern Acceptance Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1978-03-30· cited 70×
• James H. Milligan v. Robert C. Anderson, an Individual
  Tenth Circuit· 1975-09-24· cited 45×
• Veale v. Rose
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1983-06-16· cited 40×
• George Jones, Cross-Appellant v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-10-01· cited 35×
• Portland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Government Securities, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-18· cited 27×
• Unnamed case
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-01-12· cited 26×
• William Wayne Brooks v. Great Lakes Dredge-Dock Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-11-29· cited 18×
• Henry Herdman v. Erwin J. Smith
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-06-20· cited 15×
• Brooks v. Great Lakes Dredge Dock
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 14×
• Dunlop v. Beloit College
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1976-02-23· cited 12×
• Whirlpool Corp. v. Texical, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-16· cited 6×