Skip to main content
· 1/6/1988

Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc. v. Telectronics, Inc., and Telectronics Usa, Additional on Counterclaim-Appellees

Citations

  • 836 F.2d 1332
  • 5 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1424
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 240
  • 1988 WL 186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding interlocutory appeal of lower court denial of motion to disqualify
  • no attorney client relationship where inventor-employee merely assisted company’s attorneys in prosecuting the patent application”
  • “The bottom line, however, is that attorneys represent clients—not legal positions or patents.”
  • “[T]he assignment of a patent does not transfer an 13 attorney-client relationship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Baldwin, Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.