· 1/6/1988
Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc. v. Telectronics, Inc., and Telectronics Usa, Additional on Counterclaim-Appellees
Citations
- 836 F.2d 1332
- 5 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1424
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 240
- 1988 WL 186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding interlocutory appeal of lower court denial of motion to disqualify
- no attorney client relationship where inventor-employee merely assisted company’s attorneys in prosecuting the patent application”
- “The bottom line, however, is that attorneys represent clients—not legal positions or patents.”
- “[T]he assignment of a patent does not transfer an 13 attorney-client relationship”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Baldwin, Bissell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.