Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc. v. Telectronics, Inc., and Telectronics Usa, Additional on Counterclaim-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding interlocutory appeal of lower court denial of motion to disqualify
• no attorney client relationship where inventor-employee merely assisted company’s attorneys in prosecuting the patent application”
• “The bottom line, however, is that attorneys represent clients—not legal positions or patents.”
• “[T]he assignment of a patent does not transfer an 13 attorney-client relationship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical
  S.D. Ohio· 1991-08-02· cited 54×
• Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1988-05-19· cited 48×
• Plant Genetic Systems, N v. v. Ciba Seeds
  M.D. North Carolina· 1996-05-24· cited 31×
• Starlight Sugar Inc. v. Soto
  D. Puerto Rico· 1995-10-24· cited 15×
• Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC
  D. Minnesota· 2012-06-29· cited 15×
• Ramada Franchise System, Inc. v. Hotel of Gainesville Associates
  N.D. Georgia· 1997-11-19· cited 14×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. McAtee
  D. Kansas· 1988-12-29· cited 14×
• Decora Inc. v. DW Wallcovering, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1995-09-06· cited 13×
• Tannahill v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1992-01-24· cited 6×
• Edwards v. 360° Communications
  D. Nevada· 1999-10-21· cited 6×
• University of West Virginia Board of Trustees Ex Rel. West Virginia University v. Vanvoorhies
  N.D. West Virginia· 1998-11-18· cited 5×
• Goodrich v. Goodrich
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-12-04· cited 5×
• Violet v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1996-11-26· cited 4×
• Hoffmann v. Internal Medicine, P.C. of Ottumwa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1995-04-23· cited 2×
• General Electric Co. v. Industra Products, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 1988-04-20· cited 2×
• Yosemite Investment, Inc. v. Floyd Bell, Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 1996-09-20· cited 2×
• Kennecott Corporation v. United States District Court For The Southern District Of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-05-03
• Doe No. 1 v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2023-01-09
• William Scott Taylor WPEM, LLC And W2W, LLC v. Hunton Andrews Kurth, LLP, F/K/A Andrews & Kurth, LLP Douglas Rommelmann And Brett Cooke
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2023-07-13

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1953-05-25· cited 352×
• Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1984-09-25· cited 279×
• Hull v. Celanese Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1975-03-26· cited 238×
• Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpin
  Second Circuit· 1980-06-20· cited 221×
• In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-08-04· cited 169×
• Board Of Education Of The City Of New York v. Ewald Nyquist
  Second Circuit· 1979-01-09· cited 158×
• United States Football League v. National Football League
  S.D. New York· 1985-04-04· cited 105×
• James K. J. CHENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAF CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1980-08-26· cited 100×
• Goode v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 64×
• SMI Industries Canada Ltd. v. Caelter Industries, Inc.
  N.D. New York· 1984-05-21· cited 36×
• GAF Corp. v. Cheng
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 36×
• Sun Studs, Inc. v. Applied Theory Associates, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1985-09-13· cited 18×
• Ah Ju Steel Co. v. Armco, Inc.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1982-06-10· cited 10×
• New York Institute of Technology v. Biosound, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1987-04-22· cited 5×