Decora Inc. v. DW Wallcovering, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \the Court has discretion to consider evidence proving either that confidences were or were not communicated in the prior representation and to do so in a manner designed to protect confidential evidence from disclosure\
• screening not timely and attorney continued to work in same department with attorneys involved in continued representation
• disqualifying attorney whose prior representation related to the validity of the patent that was directly at issue in the present case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).