Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 4/25/1997

Ted Lapidus, S.A. v. Vann

Citations

  • 112 F.3d 91
  • 1997 WL 202195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating an award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 because the motion for sanctions only discussed Rule 11
  • vacating an award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 because the motion for sanctions only discussed Rule 11
  • “[D]ue process requires that courts provide notice and opportunity to be heard before imposing any kind of sanctions.”
  • attorney ‘must be forewarned of the authority under which sanctions are being considered, and given a chance to defend himself against specific charges”
  • “Due process requires that courts provide notice and opportunity to be heard before imposing any kind of sanction”
  • sanctions vacated where district court sanctioned conduct “beyond the conduct specified in [adversary’s] Rule 11 motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Parker, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.