Skip to main content
· 11/19/1996

Satcorp International Group and Sino American Trading Corp. v. China National Silk Import & Export Corporation, and Hugh H. Mo, Esq.

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 3
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 463
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30117
  • 1996 WL 671998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the civil-criminal fine distinction without reference to the size of the fine
  • “[D]ue process requires ... that the delinquent party be provided with notice of the possibility that sanctions will be imposed and with an opportunity to present evidence or arguments against their imposition.”
  • “[Sanctioned attorney] was given no indication of the fact that he might be fined or found in contempt. There was neither a hearing, nor oral argument, on the Rule 37 motion. His fine cannot stand.”
  • \due process requires ... that the delinquent party be provided with notice of the possibility that sanctions will be imposed and with an opportunity to present evidence or arguments against their imposition\
  • “[D]ue process requires . . . that the delinquent party be provided with notice of the possibility that sanctions will be imposed and with an opportunity to present evidence or arguments against their imposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Calabresi, Block

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.