Skip to main content
· 1/31/2002

In Re Highgate Equities, Ltd., Debtor. Shmuel Klein, Movant-Appellant v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker and David L. Tillem

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 148
  • 47 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1052
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 495
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1433
  • 39 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 17
  • 2002 WL 122925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “under Rule 11(b)(3), ‘sanctions may not be obtained unless a particular allegation is utterly lacking in support’” (citation omitted)
  • The bankruptcy court exceeds its discretion “if it based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law.”
  • “Courts have generally [applied Rule 11 to letters] only where the letter in question was in effect a motion in disguise, recognizing that failure to sanction in such cases would elevate form over substance.”
  • “We review the Bankruptcy Court’s imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Sack, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.