Taylor v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the protection of wife’s economic interest in marital property in the event of husband’s untimely death, is a strong factor in affirming bifurcation order
• pending ancillary economic rights are vested following divorce decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gaydos v. Gaydos
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-05-12· cited 61×
• In Re Wilson
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-04-27· cited 38×
• Savage v. Savage
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 16×
• Curran v. Curran
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 12×
• Estate of Pinkerton v. Pinkerton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-15· cited 11×
• Marra v. Marra
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-28· cited 11×
• Falasco v. Falasco
  Chester County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-03-02· cited 2×
• Miller v. Miller
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1988-12-02
• Davis v. Davis
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-06-12
• Weathers v. Lintzmeyer
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1990-06-26
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Crawford County Court of Common Pleas· 1991-02-05
• Bilger v. Bilger
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1990-12-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. Cronkhite
  Supreme Court· 1859-03-11· cited 538×
• Wolk v. Wolk
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-26· cited 74×
• Semasek v. Semasek
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-28· cited 68×
• McNulty v. McNulty
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-08· cited 30×
• Pastuszek v. Pastuszek
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-18· cited 30×
• Cunningham v. Cunningham (In Re Cunningham)
  D. New Mexico· 1981-01-29· cited 19×
• Schulze v. Schulze
  S.D. Ohio· 1981-10-22· cited 12×