Curran v. Curran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a decree of divorce entered after an order has been entered severing the economic issues from the action for divorce is final for purposes of appeal
• decree of divorce entered after bifurcation order severing economic issues from action for divorce is immediately appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hrinkevich v. Hrinkevich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-11· cited 67×
• Diamond v. Diamond
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-05· cited 42×
• Savage v. Savage
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 16×
• Frey v. Frey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-03· cited 13×
• Parker v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2000-02-17· cited 8×
• Caplan v. Caplan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-05-28· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frontini v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-12· cited 46×
• Fenstermaker v. Fenstermaker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-08· cited 38×
• Jawork v. Jawork
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-16· cited 28×
• Taylor v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-17· cited 17×
• DeLellis v. Borough of Verona
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-20· cited 17×
• Flowers v. Flowers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-08· cited 14×