Wolk v. Wolk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that court ‘‘improperly admitted [party’s testimony] since [he] was neither the owner of the jewelry nor an expert’’ (emphasis added)
• explaining that pendente lite support is fundamentally different from final orders of support entered at conclusion of dissolution proceeding
• “[u]nless there were no facts [on] which the [trial] court could base its finding, we as an appellate body cannot retiy the case or substitute our judgment for that of the trial court”
• ‘‘[u]nless there were no facts [on] which the [trial] court could base its finding, we as an appellate body cannot retry the case or substitute our judgment for that of the trial court’’
• husband’s opinion on wife’s emotional instability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).